$99 a year since November 2018
Cut from $149 that month and unchanged since.310 The monthly price has been $9.99 since at least 2022.36
Instacart · CHI Company Investigation · Food & Local Commerce
Conclusion: Partially supports · Mechanism: benefit erosion and fee opacity · No score assigned
The membership stayed $99. The protection from service fees did not.
Instacart+ stayed $99 a year while its service-fee benefit moved from exemption, to discount, to nothing. The broader investigation partially supports customer hostility: the clearest deterioration is in fees and benefit erosion, not advertising.
Dated from Instacart’s own help pages where they survive. The service fee is separate from the delivery fee, is kept by Instacart, and does not go to the shopper.9
A 10% “service amount” took the default tip’s place at checkout. Customers could change or remove it.1
“from a 10 percent waivable fee to a 5 percent fixed fee”
A 5% default tip was restored alongside it.2
Express was cut from $149 to $99 and members stopped paying the 5% service fee. Non-members still paid it.3
“Express members pay a reduced service fee starting as low as 1.9%.”
Non-member fees began at 5%.4
Not establishedThe exact date between Nov 2018 and Sep 2020 when the exemption became a discount.
“Starting March 1, 2025, we will no longer offer reduced service fees for Instacart+ members.”
Instacart’s benefits page, January 2025.7 By April 2025 no service-fee benefit was listed.38
December 2024The fees page still said “Instacart+ members pay a reduced service fee.”5
$0 delivery fees on eligible orders of $10 or more. “Service fees apply.”9
Current rateNot published. Instacart says service fees vary with factors like location, retailer and basket.918
Members went from paying no service fee (2018), to a reduced one (by 2020), to the same service-fee terms Instacart states for everyone (since 1 March 2025). The annual price stayed $99 throughout.
The membership did not become worthless. One economically meaningful protection was removed while others improved.
Service-fee protection: full, then partial
Service-fee protection: none stated
Illustration only. On a $100 basket, the floors Instacart published in September 2020 imply a service fee starting at $1.90 for a member and $5.00 for a non-member.4 These are advertised minimums, not typical charges. No comparable figure exists today: Instacart publishes no rate for either group.
The $0-delivery minimum fell from $35 to $10 (standing by February 2025).8 Peacock Premium and, for annual members, New York Times Cooking were added; household sharing went from 2 to 4 people by January 2025.6710 The annual price has been $99 since November 2018.
The service fee varies with the cart. A full exemption, then a reduced rate, protected members most on large orders. That protection ended on 1 March 2025, in the same restructuring that lowered the minimum.735
Membership waives the delivery fee on eligible orders. It does not waive the service fee. Instacart’s wording now says so where it describes the benefit.
“Instacart+ members get free delivery on eligible orders $10 or more per retailer.”Instacart Help Center12
Quoted from Instacart’s “Instacart fees and taxes” page, read 11 October 2026.9 The Terms of Service say that for members “Other charges still apply (including service fees…)”.11
The delivery/service distinction is now stated wherever the membership benefit is described, and the settlement requires other fees to be disclosed clearly whenever free or discounted delivery is claimed.15 It remains a footnote, and the service-fee amount is not shown until checkout. The wording changed between 6 November and 12 December 2025, around the time of the settlement; this page does not establish what caused it.
The experiment was randomized, not personalized — but customers were still shown different prices for identical goods at the same time. This is separate from the membership story.
Consumer Reports finding
In September 2025, volunteers organised by Consumer Reports and partners shopped simultaneously for identical baskets at Safeway and Target on Instacart.17 The investigation also reported price experiments at Albertsons, Costco, Kroger and Sprouts.
“Retailers set the item prices on the Instacart marketplace.”20
“The price you see for items on Instacart is determined by our retail partners — not by Instacart.”18
One way Instacart recognises retailer revenue is “the difference in price between amounts charged to customers for goods and the actual settlement price to the retailer for the goods”.16
Target told Consumer Reports it had no business relationship with Instacart. Instacart acknowledged taking Target’s public prices and adding an amount to cover its own costs.17
Instacart says retailers generally set item prices. Its filings also disclose that in some arrangements it earns the spread between what the customer pays and what the retailer receives. The company does not disclose how much of its business uses this model.
This shows pricing opacity, not universal control. Each storefront carries a pricing-policy label (“Everyday Store Prices” or “View pricing policy”), and customers can filter for retailers with no markup.2018
Instacart can earn from the customer, the retailer and the advertiser inside the same transaction. That is a structural fact, not in itself a finding of hostility.
Instacart has thoroughly monetized product discovery. The investigation did not establish that paid placement is concealed or that advertising itself materially worsened customer value.
This side of the ledger is why the verdict is PARTIALLY SUPPORTS, not SUPPORTS or STRONGLY SUPPORTS.
Cut from $149 that month and unchanged since.310 The monthly price has been $9.99 since at least 2022.36
The member minimum for $0 delivery on standard eligible orders fell from $35 to $10.837
Retailers including Hy-Vee, Raley’s, Fareway and Grocery Outlet moved to no-markup pricing in 2025–2026.3031
Clearer than the earlier “free delivery” wording.9
Discontinued in December 2025, followed by published pricing principles.18
Instacart’s revenue as a share of gross transaction value has held at about 10%.24
Also on the record: Instacart’s ad specification requires a “Sponsored” label,25 and the written refund policy now asks customers to choose their resolution, credit or refund.32
CHI’s institutional signal taxonomy, applied without forcing a fit.
The central finding. The service fee went from waivable to mandatory; members lost first an exemption and then a discount at an unchanged price; filings name “customer fee optimization”; price tests tried different price points; advertising raises revenue per order.
Counterweight: revenue share flat since 2023, membership price flat, free-delivery minimum improved, price parity expanding.
In New York City, a $5.99 regulatory response fee per delivery appeared in January 2026 as the city’s delivery-worker minimum pay rules took effect.29 Instacart’s fees page confirms NYC regulatory response fees appear in the order summary.9 Whether the fee is proportionate to the cost was not established.
No previously included access was newly metered. The “free delivery” issue is a disclosure question, not new monetization of free access.
No customer-facing product was retired or deprioritised. The Express to Instacart+ rebrand kept the price.
The live checkout and refund screens were not inspected; nothing on this page describes which option the interface pre-selects.
Final CHI assessment · Partially supports
Instacart did not simply increase the price of its membership. Instead, it gradually reduced one of the membership’s protections while keeping the headline price unchanged. At the same time, the company expanded the number of ways it earns from each grocery transaction.
But the investigation does not show continuous deterioration. The membership price stayed flat, the free-delivery threshold improved, pricing transparency has become clearer, and monetization has been stable since 2023.
The evidence therefore partially supports customer hostility: the strongest case is benefit erosion and fee opacity, not advertising itself. No numerical CHI, CVI or CFS score has been assigned.
The price didn’t change.
What it protected you from did.
Sources
Every figure on this page comes from the Instacart CHI research dossier and its publication verification (both 11 October 2026), and traces to a source below. Quotation marks are used only for wording checked against the original source. Labels: allegation means pleaded but not adjudicated; company-reported means an Instacart figure or claim not independently audited; calculated means arithmetic from sourced inputs.
Limits carried onto this page. The live Instacart checkout, refund screens and search results were not inspected, so actual member and non-member service fees on identical orders were not observed and no interface default is described. Instacart publishes no current service-fee rate. The FTC complaint itself could not be retrieved; its allegations are described from the FTC’s announcement and the filed order. The date the stipulated order was entered by the court was not confirmed from the docket. The share of Instacart’s business using settlement spreads, and the density of sponsored results, are not disclosed. The NYC fee amount comes from local press.
Status. Research frozen 11 October 2026 and publication-verified the same day. No numerical CHI, CVI or CFS score has been assigned; scoring is reserved for a later calibration stage.
Reading this beside the rest of the index
DoorDash and Uber Eats show fee structures growing more conditional. Instacart shows a membership keeping its price while losing a protection. Read the methodology for why no score is assigned yet.