How it works
Intellectual Disrespect requires two things at once: a business practice that is plainly at odds with reasonable customer expectations, and a public explanation for that practice written in sanitized, condescending, or rectitudinous corporate language, borrowed from the register of policy or ethics rather than a plain description of what is actually happening.
The explanation does not have to be dishonest to qualify. It has to be doing rhetorical work: reframing a customer-negative decision as reasonable, necessary, or beneficial, so that disagreeing with the decision means arguing with reasonableness itself. The disrespect is in expecting the customer to accept that framing instead of recognizing the contradiction for themselves.
Recognition checklist
What to look for
A customer-negative practice exists
Something plainly costs the customer money, time, access, or control, independent of how the company chooses to describe it.
The language performs reasonableness
The explanation is calm, procedural, or ethical in register, and reframes the decision as balanced, responsible, or even good for the customer.
The customer is expected to accept the frame
The explanation is not offered as one input among several. It is presented as the correct way to see the situation, and disagreement is treated as unreasonable.
Where it appears
Associated companies
Luxy is the first scored company assignment under this pattern, where it is the primary finding: premium marketing language describing a messaging entitlement materially broader than the one the subscription buys. Intellectual Disrespect has also been referenced informally in CHI's Ticketmaster and Anthropic coverage; neither of those references currently constitutes a scored company assignment, and further formal scoring will follow as evidence is assessed.
Important distinction
Not simply information asymmetry.
Intellectual Disrespect is not simply information asymmetry, a lack of transparency, or a company possessing information the customer does not. Those conditions can exist on their own, with no rhetorical move involved at all.
The defining mechanism is narrower: a customer-negative business practice, paired with a sanitized, condescending, or rectitudinous explanation that attempts to portray the practice as reasonable, necessary, or beneficial.