OnlyFans does better
Formal appeals, written process and published enforcement figures. It also has evidenced cases of creators being paid after their account was terminated.
Creator Comparison
Both take 20%. The important differences begin when something goes wrong.
Written for creators · Research current to 5 October 2026
Both give you real infrastructure for the same bargain: you keep 80%, they keep 20%. The differences are in payment risk, payout review, enforcement, appeals, discovery, portability and control. This page tells you what they mean for how you operate.
Formal appeals, written process and published enforcement figures. It also has evidenced cases of creators being paid after their account was terminated.
Ordinary chargeback protection and clearer outbound linking. It also provides more built-in discovery tools.
The 80/20 split. Heavy platform control. No meaningful subscriber portability. On both, an unwithdrawn balance is exposed during serious enforcement.
OnlyFans puts more routine payment-reversal risk on you. Fansly gives you weaker formal protection when the platform itself acts against you.
Neither platform is clearly safer overall. Each card is a summary; every claim is sourced and qualified further down. “Better” always means better at a specific thing, never better to creators in general. Using both spreads the risks they differ on. It does not fix the ones they share.
02 · The creator survival guide
The rules that matter before you ever need them.
Know
Established facts to understand before you operate on either platform.
Both platforms
Neither contract gives a simple guarantee that unrelated, already-cleared earnings will be paid out after a termination for cause. Neither commits to taking only the money linked to a violation. The evidence of what actually happens differs.
OnlyFans
The Terms let OnlyFans treat any part of your Creator Earnings as forfeited
and refund fans. In signed written replies, OnlyFans has said one terminated creator’s remaining earnings were refunded to subscribers, and that another could withdraw the whole available balance. Creators report both outcomes. No part-payment was found, and no published rule says which outcome applies.
Fansly
The Terms allow forfeiture of any revenue earned by Users that violate these Terms
. Creators have posted Fansly emails stating that any funds associated with it will be forfeited
and that the decision was final and cannot be reversed
, with Fansly staff confirming the termination in the same thread. In the Fansly material CHI reviewed, no terminated creator was found later reporting payment of the balance. That is an absence of evidence, not proof that Fansly never pays.
Treat any unwithdrawn balance as money at risk, on either platform.
Both platforms
OnlyFansWhen a fan wins a chargeback or refund, OnlyFans normally deducts your share: the Terms say it may deduct an amount equal to the Creator Earnings portion
. Some disputes instead show you will be paid anyway
.
FanslyFansly says it protects you from most chargebacks
, and creators confirm it. It reserves exceptions, and its Terms still keep a right to deduct.
Fansly is better for ordinary chargeback protection. How it works →
OnlyFans
A contractual Appeals Policy covers account and content suspension or deactivation, final warnings, feature restrictions and restrictions on your ability to monetise. The only route is the Deactivation Appeal Form. The Terms give six months; in-app notices say 30 days.
Appeals are decided by OnlyFans’ own Appeals Team, not an independent body. There is no binding decision deadline and no second level. A dispute about forfeited earnings goes to a separate Complaints Policy that never mentions earnings.
Fansly
Review does exist: you reply to the email that announced the decision, you can send documents, and Fansly staff have reversed at least one termination they acknowledged was a mistake, within about a day.
But no appeal form, published decision deadline, guaranteed second reviewer or published reinstatement standard was found in the Terms, the Help Center or the app’s code.
Both platforms
You don’t get fans’ contact details on either platform, and neither offers an export that would recreate your paying relationships somewhere else. Subscriptions don’t move. On OnlyFans they are deleted with the account.
The fan-privacy reason for this is legitimate. The practical effect is the same: the paying relationship belongs to the platform’s billing system, not to you.
Both platforms
Neither platform requires exclusivity, and both take a non-exclusive licence to your content. Fansly says You’re welcome to share other websites too, as long as they follow our Terms of Service.
OnlyFans has no rule against being elsewhere, but its published guidance doesn’t say whether you may link another subscription platform.
What is prohibited is different: OnlyFans says If you try to direct Fans to make a payment outside the OnlyFans platform there is a risk your account will be deactivated.
Fansly sanctions on-platform requests to move contact or meetings off-platform.
Watch
Conditions where scrutiny, holds or enforcement recur in the evidence. None of these means trouble is coming. They are the moments to be prepared for.
Fansly
Fansly’s Help Center says Most payout requests are reviewed and approved by our team within 48 hours
. Fansly support staff have also said, in public forum replies, that when you request a payout your content is reviewed for compliance with the Terms. Several documented enforcement cases began at a payout request, including some at a creator’s first payout.
That does not mean every payout triggers an enforcement review. Most are simply approved.
OnlyFans
No payout-request review trigger was established at OnlyFans across about 30 payout-related cases. That doesn’t mean it never reviews at payout. OnlyFans has said its compliance team runs regular checks
and planned ID verifications, during which payouts can be switched off while the page keeps earning.
A large balance allowed to build up may meet compliance scrutiny at the moment you try to withdraw it.
Both platforms
Identity, consent and release documents for anyone else in your content come up again and again in holds and terminations on both platforms. On OnlyFans, co-performer documentation is the largest group among the creator-reported cases found where a whole balance was lost, and 48-hour document deadlines are reported. On Fansly, missing consent documents are the reason given most often in the wallet-lock cases found.
Both platforms
OnlyFansOnlyFans has said that when it suspects a fan’s payment is fraudulent, it refunds the payment itself and deducts it from the creator. No working dispute route for this was found. The app also tells creators their chargeback ratio should be under 1%
; what happens above that is unpublished.
FanslyCreators report balances locked while Fansly examined one unusually heavy-spending fan, and partial deductions where purchases came from a fraud network.
Both platforms
Not supplying identity, tax, performer or payout information on time can block your money. OnlyFans’ app lists payout blocks for photo ID, W-9 and DAC7 tax forms, payout-detail checks, a name that doesn’t match your payout provider, and a payout account used by another account. A Fansly notice quoted by a creator reads: Please complete the verification request within five (5) days… During the review, your account balance will be temporarily restricted.
Both platforms
Keep four things separate:
Both platforms
Don’t assume content that was acceptable stays acceptable. On 23 June 2025 Fansly emailed creators new and clarified
content rules, told them to remove affected content by 28 June, and cited its payment processors
. That is five days for content already published. OnlyFans’ Community Guidelines
are its help centre, so a help-page edit changes a rule you agreed to, and a creator reports a final warning covering messages sent months earlier.
Pending · not in force OnlyFans has published, at an unlinked page, a revised Terms text dated October 2026. It is not the operative contract. As written it would remove seriously or repeatedly
from the no-notice clause and add grounds for reputational harm and for not promptly providing requested information. Creators report an email saying it applies from 1 November 2026; OnlyFans’ own statement of that date was not seen.
Both platforms
FanslyA $5-a-month fee comes out of a balance after 12 months without a login, until the balance is zero. (The Terms say no login; the Help Center says no activity.)
OnlyFansContent-removal notices say you can appeal within 30 days
; the contract says six months. Whether a later appeal is refused is unknown. Act within 30 days.
This is unusual
Know what an ordinary workflow looks like, so you recognise when you’ve entered a different one. No safe number of days is published by either platform, and CHI doesn’t invent one.
Fansly
Processing
final and cannot be reversed,
will not be further reviewed or consideredor
will be forfeited
A temporary lock by itself does not establish forfeiture. No lock was found turning into a permanent loss without a termination, and documented locks have been released after documents arrived, one of them after staff called its length not appropriate
.
OnlyFans
will be refunded. On two creators’ accounts they were paid anyway. The notice is not the final word either way
OnlyFans
Your earnings for this Chargeback were not reversed and you will be paid anyway.No published rule explains when it applies.
Account removal process initiated, you will receive payout automatically once all payments are clearedexists in the app but in no published rule. One creator reports seeing it after OnlyFans deactivated their page, and being paid days later.
detailed evidencewill be denied, but has two text fields and no file upload.
Do
Precautions that follow directly from the findings above.
01 · Most important
Don’t let a large balance sit on either platform. Withdrawing doesn’t guarantee protection. It reduces how much is inside the platform if a review or enforcement action begins.
Fansly
It matters more here. Every payout request goes for approval, and Fansly staff say content is checked for compliance at that point, so a balance left to build is reviewed when it is largest.
OnlyFans
Automatic monthly, weekly or (where available) daily payouts can keep the balance low. But withdrawn money isn’t immune: creators report later chargebacks creating a negative balance that future earnings pay down.
02
Don’t rely on the platform as your only bookkeeping. Save earnings, payout and transaction records regularly. On OnlyFans, download each payout invoice and your tax documents; the web app has no earnings-ledger export. Fansly’s app code contains CSV downloads of wallet history, payout requests and earnings statistics. Use them if your account shows them.
03
Don’t use a platform vault as your only archive. Neither platform’s app code offers a bulk vault download, and OnlyFans’ Terms say you will not be able to access your Content after your account is terminated.
04
For everyone who appears in your content: ID and signed consent or release, stored together and retrievable in minutes. Reported deadlines can be 48 hours or less. Tag co-performers where the platform expects it.
05
Social accounts, a website, a mailing list or other lawful channels you control reduce your dependence on either platform. They do not make paid subscribers portable. They give people a way to find you again.
06
Running both can spread the platform-specific risks they differ on. It doesn’t solve audience ownership or balance exposure. What multi-homing does and doesn’t fix →
07
On OnlyFans, appeal within 30 days. On Fansly, reply to the email with the documents asked for, inside the stated deadline. On both, keep copies of everything you send. The evidence checklist →
03 · Where each platform is actually better
Not a scoreboard. The rows are not equally important: chargebacks or balance treatment may matter far more to you than discovery. Each verdict says what one platform is better at.
paid anyway; no rule says when.
at any time, for any reason, with or without prior notice; no reasons requirement.
Verdicts compare which written position or documented practice is more creator-protective on that one point. They are not added up. Nine groups of further detail are in the full comparison.
04 · Follow the money
Every fan payment moves through the same stages on both platforms. The risks attach at different stages.
Both research files treat the 20% as a facially reasonable price for payments, hosting, moderation and billing, not as hostility.
OnlyFans
Keeps 20% of every fan payment and pays creators 80%. Its 2025 accounts say it paid out $6.2 billion to creators.
RuleFansly
Creators receive 80% of revenue from subscriptions, sold media, messages, and tips. No hidden fees for payouts, processing, or currency conversion.
Seven days on both, with one OnlyFans exception worth checking.
OnlyFans
7 days. Creators in a small number of countries that have a high level of reversed transactions
have a 21-day pending period for their first four months. The country list is only visible after login.
Fansly
After each transaction, your funds enter a 7-day pending period.
One fixed period, published.
The clearest procedural difference in the money flow.
OnlyFans
Requests are processed immediately and should be paid within 3-5 business days. In some cases, it can take up to 10 business days.
Minimum $20 for most methods. No payout-request review trigger was established. That is not proof OnlyFans never reviews at payout.
Fansly
Each request is reviewed and approved; Fansly says most are approved within 48 hours, though often sooner.
Staff say content is checked for compliance at that point. Minimums: $20 (Paxum, Cosmopayment), $50 (SEPA), $100 (SWIFT, crypto).
The difference most likely to affect ordinary income, because it doesn’t depend on you doing anything wrong.
OnlyFans · default
Your share is deducted by default.
Terms: we may deduct an amount equal to the Creator Earnings portion of the refunded or chargedback amount.
The same applies to refunds OnlyFans issues itself on suspected fraud. Exceptions exist: a paid anyway
status, a flow requiring the fan to repay, and a few refunds OnlyFans funded itself. How often each happens is unknown. No chargeback fee was found.
Fansly · default
Generally absorbed by Fansly.
Yes, almost always. Fansly protects you from most chargebacks
, but it reserves the right to deduct for an unusually high number of chargebacks compared to the general creator base
, for revenue from violating content, and in exceptional cases where creator fault is determined
. Staff add undelivered customs. Partial deductions occur in fraud cases. The Terms still reserve a right to deduct.
Mostly an OnlyFans issue, because that is where chargebacks land on the creator by default.
OnlyFans
Many creators independently report deductions arriving weeks or months after the sale, reaching money that had already cleared, and negative balances, including after a payout, which later earnings then pay down. The 7-day pending period does not cap this exposure.
Documented casesFansly
Fan refunds can still be taken from a live balance and show as an itemised admin balance deduction
. Because ordinary chargebacks are generally absorbed, there is less routine exposure here.
Better only in the evidence of payment. On both, the whole unwithdrawn balance is exposed when an account is terminated for cause.
OnlyFans
Contract. On a suspected serious or repeated breach, OnlyFans may act without warning or Notice and for as long as is necessary to review the relevant facts
, including withholding earnings. On a finding, it may treat any part of your Creator Earnings as forfeited
and refund fans, and must give a statement of reasons why.
What happens. Three outcomes are evidenced: the whole balance paid or stated payable (once in a signed company reply, four times creator-reported); the whole remaining balance stated returned to subscribers or cardholders (twice in signed replies, at least nine times creator-reported); or unknown. No part-payment was found. Where reversed money finally goes is not established.
Fansly
Contract. Fansly may terminate at any time, for any reason, with or without prior notice
, may delete your account without payment
, and may forfeit revenue earned by users who violate its Terms. Its Help Center: Funds may be withheld if the termination results from a violation of the Terms
.
What happens. Fansly has told specific creators, in emails they posted, that their funds would be forfeited and the decision was final. CHI identified 44 cases (posts) alleging money held or lost on termination, ban or suspension. No terminated creator was found later reporting payment. Whether forfeited money is refunded to fans or kept is not established either way.
05 · What can get you in trouble
The categories that recur in holds and enforcement on both platforms. A breach doesn’t automatically mean termination: for ordinary content breaches both platforms are documented giving warnings or short suspensions first, though neither publishes a strike count and both skip straight to termination for some categories.
Both must verify the age, identity and consent of everyone who appears. OnlyFans’ Terms require a tagged creator or an adult whose ID and written, informed consent
you hold.
Content removed, wallet or payouts locked until documents arrive, termination. OnlyFans’ Terms let it withhold all or any portion
of earnings. Creators on both report losing whole balances in these cases. Documented cases
Get ID and a signed release before you shoot or post. Tag where expected. Answer document requests inside the deadline, even if it’s 48 hours.
The verified person must be the person in the content and the person being paid.
Re-verification that doesn’t match, an expired ID or a payout name mismatch can pause payouts. Creators on Fansly report terminations after re-verification failures. In one OnlyFans case the account was transferred to the person shown in the content. Documented cases
Keep ID current. Make sure the account holder, the person on camera and the payout details match.
Stolen cards and fraud rings cost the platform and threaten its payment processing.
OnlyFans has said it refunds suspected-fraud payments and deducts them from the creator. Fansly has locked balances while it examined a single fan’s spending, and made partial deductions in fraud-network cases. Platform practice
Expect questions when one fan spends unusually heavily. Keep the message history and delivery records for big sales.
Both have tied content rules to payment partners: OnlyFans in 2021 (a ban it then suspended), Fansly in 2025. Neither named a card network.
Removal with a warning is the documented first response for ordinary breaches on both; suspensions of 1–7 days are reported on Fansly. Serious categories can mean immediate termination. Documented cases
Read the current list on the platform you’re on; they differ. When unsure, ask in writing first. OnlyFans’ guide says just ask us
.
It takes the transaction, and the platform’s cut, outside its system.
OnlyFans: there is a risk your account will be deactivated.
One creator reports a closure after sharing a payment-app handle; others report warnings for sharing a messaging-app username. On Fansly, a warning and one-day ban for mentioning a messaging app is reported. Rule Documented cases
Never share payment handles or send a platform fan somewhere else to pay. Promote other channels where permitted, not as a payment route.
Prostitution and trafficking rules. OnlyFans: Creators and Fans cannot use OnlyFans to discuss or arrange in real life meetings.
Fansly’s list bans solicitation whether explicitly or by use of any slang
.
Terminations are reported on both, some within a day and some without prior warning, including where the creator says it was role-play. Documented cases
Don’t discuss meeting, prices for meeting, or locations, even as a joke or role-play.
Compliance reviews can’t close without it.
Balance restricted during review; deadlines of a few days; termination when deadlines pass. In one OnlyFans case, a balance the company said was payable was still unpaid four months later, pending a W-9. Documented cases
Check email, including spam, daily while you have a balance. Fansly’s lock banner sends you to email. Reply with everything at once and keep a copy.
Tax reporting (W-9, 1099, EU DAC7) and payout-provider checks are legal obligations.
OnlyFans’ app lists payout blocks for W-9, DAC7, payout-detail verification and name mismatches. Fansly staff cite tax and address paperwork among lock triggers. Platform practice
File tax forms before your first payout. Use a payout account in your own verified name, and update both sides together if anything changes.
High dispute ratios threaten card-processing relationships.
Fansly’s protection has a stated exception for an unusually high number of chargebacks compared to the general creator base
; the threshold is unpublished. OnlyFans says your ratio should be under 1%
. Creators report price caps, messaging limits and a missing payout button after clusters. Platform practice
Deliver what you sell, promptly, and keep proof of delivery. Block or refuse fans who repeatedly dispute.
06 · If your money or account gets flagged
Before you reply to anything, preserve the record while you still have access. After termination you may lose access to your content and account history. Tick items off as you go; nothing here is saved or sent anywhere.
Fansly
Fansly’s publicly served app code includes CSV downloads for wallet history, payout requests and earnings statistics. If those controls appear in your account, export them now, while you still have access. Whether they are live for every creator wasn’t verified. The wallet-history file is capped at 5,000 sales per file, so export in date ranges.
Platform practiceOnlyFans
The web app has no earnings-ledger or statistics export in its code. Download each payout’s invoice and your tax documents (1099, W-9, VAT invoices), and screenshot statements. A self-service personal-data request exists; whether it stays available to a terminated creator, and what it contains, wasn’t established.
Don’t let the platform be the only place where evidence of your business exists.
07 · Recourse
OnlyFans gives you a formal route for account and content decisions. Neither gives you a structured route for money already earned.
OnlyFans
The only way to appeal a Decision is to complete and submit the Deactivation Appeal Form.Two text boxes, no file upload. Without
detailed evidencethe appeal
will be denied.
within 30 days. Act within 30 days where you can.
not liablefor lost earnings or subscribers during the downtime.
OnlyFans’ own figures. They pool fans and creators and every decision type, so they are not a creator success rate. In year 2, 50,107 complaints ended without a decision and 25,011 appear in no outcome row.
Fansly
final and cannot be reversedand
will not be further reviewed or considered.
we can’t disclose.
OnlyFans gives the account a process. Neither gives the money one.
On OnlyFans, a creator who loses both account and balance is sent down two separate tracks. On Fansly there is one informal track for both.08 · If you use both
For creators who run both, the two platforms differ on exactly the risks a second platform can spread.
On OnlyFans, expect
Payment attrition: chargebacks, fraud refunds and occasional negative balances. If your account is challenged, lean on the written process and act within 30 days.
On Fansly, expect
Routine payments to hold. Treat the payout request and any co-performer documentation gap as the moments of exposure, and don’t let the balance build.
Multi-platform protects revenue infrastructure. It doesn’t make your customers portable.
09 · The detailed comparison
The back end of this page: the creator-relevant rows of CHI’s research matrix, grouped and expandable. Every row states the live position on 5 October 2026. The pending OnlyFans text carries no weight in any verdict.
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue split | OnlyFans20% of every fan payment; creator gets 80%. Rule | Fansly80% of subscriptions, sold media, messages and tips. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Payout minimum | OnlyFansFor most payout methods, it is $20.Per-method figures only visible after login. Platform practice | FanslyPublished per method: $20 Paxum and Cosmopayment, $50 SEPA, $100 SWIFT and crypto. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Pending period | OnlyFans7 days; 21 days for the first four months in a small number of high-reversal countries (list behind login). Platform practice | FanslyFixed 7 days per transaction. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Payout timing | OnlyFansprocessed immediately; paid within 3–5 business days, up to 10. Automatic monthly, weekly or (where available) daily payouts. Platform practice | FanslyReview mostly within 48 hours; delivery 1–3 business days, up to four; international bank and crypto sent every three days. Five different timing figures appear on Fansly’s own pages. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Payout review | OnlyFansNo published approval step. No payout-request review trigger established. Periodic regular checksand planned ID verifications can pause payouts. Platform practiceNot established | FanslyEvery request is reviewed and approved. Staff say content is reviewed for compliance at payout; several enforcement cases began there. Platform practiceDocumented cases | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Fees | OnlyFansNo OnlyFans payout fee is stated anywhere; bank or e-wallet fees may apply. Per-method details are behind login, so “no fee” can’t be verified. RuleNot established | FanslyNo hidden fees for payouts, processing, or currency conversion.What either actually charges wasn’t verified. Platform practiceNot established | VerdictNot established |
| Chargebacks | OnlyFansCreator share deducted by default, including on refunds OnlyFans issues for suspected fraud. A paid anywaystatus and occasional OnlyFans-funded refunds exist. No fee found. RulePlatform practiceDocumented cases | FanslyGenerally absorbed, by Fansly’s account and creators’ reports. Exceptions: unusually high chargebacks, violating content, creator fault, undelivered customs. Terms reserve a right to deduct. RulePlatform practiceDocumented cases | VerdictFansly better |
| Refunds | OnlyFansGranted refunds are deducted from the creator. No notice or dispute window documented. Block-fan dialog: If they request a refund the amount will be deducted from your next payout. RulePlatform practice | FanslySays it reaches out first on undelivered customs. Staff describe a 72-hour window to dispute a fan refund (informal, one documented case). Platform practiceDocumented cases | VerdictFansly better |
| Negative balances | OnlyFansMany creators report chargebacks after payout leaving a negative balance that later earnings pay down. No collection outside the platform found. Documented cases | FanslyNot established in the Fansly research. Not established | VerdictNot established |
| Inactive-balance charges | OnlyFansNone. No dormancy fee in the Terms. Rule | Fansly$5 a month from the balance after 12 months without login, until zero. First seen in the January 2024 Terms. Rule | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Currency conversion | OnlyFansPaid in USD; your bank or e-wallet may charge conversion. Who converts on local-currency rails is unknown. RuleNot established | FanslySays no hidden conversion fees, but notes some payers may not use the exact mid-market rate. Platform practice | VerdictNot established |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warnings | OnlyFansA discretionary six-step list (deactivate content, warning, final warning, suspend, deactivate, ban). Warning first is documented for ordinary breaches; skipped for co-performer, meet-up, identity and fraud grounds. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyNo warning step in any document. Informal ladder in practice: warning, 1–7-day suspensions, termination. Strike count undisclosed; bypassed for serious categories. Documented cases | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Suspensions | OnlyFansNo-notice suspension on suspicion, for as long as is necessary; no time limit. Short restrictions reported in a few cases. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyImmediate suspension without notice allowed. 1–7-day suspensions for content breaches in practice. RuleDocumented cases | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Termination without cause | OnlyFanswith 30 days’ Notice, at any time, for any reason. No creator found who received that notice. RuleNot established | Fanslyat any time, for any reason, with or without prior notice(added May 2025). Rule | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Notice | OnlyFans30 days on the no-cause route; none on a suspected serious or repeated breach. At suspension, only we will try to Notify you. Rule | FanslyNone required for any enforcement action. Rule | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Reasons | OnlyFansPromised: will provide a statement of reasons why. In practice, category-level templates. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyNo reasons requirement. In practice a clause-level reason by email; sometimes evidence, sometimes we can’t disclose. Documented cases | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Cure | OnlyFansNone in documents; an app state restores untagged posts once releases are verified. 48-hour document deadlines reported; cure accepted in some cases, refused in others. Platform practiceDocumented cases | FanslyNone in documents. Staff describe longer document timelines with extensions, in inconsistent versions; shorter deadlines also reported. Documented cases | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Balance holds | OnlyFansWithholding for as long as is necessary, no cap. Holds from under a day to about four months; the page can keep earning while withdrawal is off. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyWithdrawal-only wallet locks; no deadline binds Fansly. Documented releases; extended freezes of about a month and about two months on large balances. Platform practiceDocumented cases | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Balance treatment at termination | OnlyFansForfeiture of any partallowed. Whole balances paid in some cases; in others OnlyFans has said they were refunded to payers. No part-payment found. RulePlatform practiceDocumented cases | FanslyForfeiture of violators’ revenue allowed; whole-balance forfeiture declared final in documented cases. No later payment found among 44 cases identified. RuleDocumented cases | VerdictOnlyFans better |
About the Fansly case count. The 44 cases are posts found in public creator forums and on X, not a sample. Fansly publishes no enforcement figures, so they cannot be turned into a rate. In 19 of the 43 forum cases the creator admitted, or Fansly staff stated, a breach of a written rule. The OnlyFans cases were gathered differently (signed company replies, review sites, press and partial forum search) and are not comparable count for count.
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appeal route | OnlyFansContractual Appeals Policy; the Deactivation Appeal Form is the only route; tracked as a ticket. Rule | FanslyNo published creator appeal for account or money decisions. Email review. Rule | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Deadline on you | OnlyFansSix months in the contract; within 30 daysin content-removal notices. Whether later appeals are refused is unknown. RuleNot established | FanslyNo appeal window because no process. One-year bar on arbitration claims. Rule | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Evidence burden | OnlyFansMust give detailed evidenceyou didn’t breach the rules, in two text boxes with no upload. Rule | FanslyYou can send documents and explanations by email; extensions given to creators who engage. Documented cases | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Second reviewer | OnlyFansAn Appeals Teamwith a non-arbitrariness standard; nothing says it differs from the first decision-maker; no second level. Rule | FanslyNo different or senior reviewer; the same compliance function re-reads its decision. Documented cases | VerdictNot established |
| Decision deadline | OnlyFansNone binding; an aim of 24–48 hours. Rule | FanslyNone binding on Fansly. Rule | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Published outcomes | OnlyFans9,023 appeals granted (year 1) and 11,134 complaints reversed (year 2), all users and decision types pooled. Rows by decision type removed from its EU file. Platform practice | FanslyNone published. At least one staff-confirmed reversal found; up to three on looser evidence. Documented cases | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Money disputes | OnlyFansForfeiture goes to a Complaints Policy that never mentions earnings; holds and deductions have no named route. Rule | FanslyNo route for either. Rule | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Courts or arbitration | OnlyFansCourts of England and Wales; no arbitration clause; one-year limit; right to terminate a user who sues (no use found). EU and UK mediation on paper. Rule | FanslyMandatory individual arbitration with class waiver; one-year bar; small-claims carve-out; 30-day opt-out. Rule | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Liability cap | OnlyFansGreater of fees paid to OnlyFans or $5,000. Rule | FanslyGreater of $100 or the amount of the purchase, which for a creator reads as $100. Rule | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performer verification | OnlyFansCo-performers must be tagged creators or adults whose ID and written consent you hold. Accounts featuring many third parties may be restricted. Rule | FanslyThird-party KYC and a co-performer consent-form workflow. RulePlatform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Consent | OnlyFansAnyone appearing may withdraw consent at any time. Rule | FanslyRevenge porndefined as content with anyone who hasn’t consented to it being captured or shared. Rule | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Prohibited categories | OnlyFansAcceptable Use Policy: 14 items; role-play of prohibited acts barred. No intoxication or alcohol rule found. Rule | FanslyA longer list including anthropomorphic content, amateur or partywrestling, alcohol and cannabis, and hypnosis and intoxication. Rule | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Payment-partner rules | OnlyFansAnnounced an explicit-content ban in 2021 citing banking partners and payout providers, then suspended it before it took effect. Rule | FanslyChanged rules in June 2025 citing payment processors, naming no company. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Rule-change notice | OnlyFansPromises notice of ordinary changes so you can leave. About six weeks given in 2021; a pending change emailed about 30 days ahead, on creators’ accounts. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyNo obligation to notify. Five days to remove already-published content in June 2025; detailed tests given in individual support emails, with inconsistent answers reported. RuleDocumented cases | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal discovery | OnlyFansHelp centre: fans need your username. App code has a suggestions feature (opt-out), gated search and a limited-rollout Discover feed. Contribution unquantified. Platform practiceRule | FanslyOn-platform search, recommendations and an opt-in For You page. Value unquantified. Platform practice | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Installed demand | OnlyFans437 million fan accounts and $7.84 billion in fan payments in its 2025 accounts. Platform practice | FanslyNo reliable comparable figure; a third-party traffic model only. Not established | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| External promotion | OnlyFansNo rule on linking other platforms; 22 sanctioned profile buttons (no rival subscription platform); free-form website field moderated case by case. RulePlatform practice | FanslyYou’re welcome to share other websites too; bio links and links in posts. Platform practice | VerdictFansly better |
| Naming a competitor | OnlyFansNo clause. No verified sanction found; creators believe it’s unsafe; filter contents unknown. RuleNot established | FanslyNo clause; no discipline found. Rule | VerdictFansly better |
| Multi-homing | OnlyFansAllowed; non-exclusive licence. Rule | FanslyAllowed; non-exclusive licence. Rule | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscriber export | OnlyFansNone in the web app’s code. Platform practice | FanslyNo follower, subscriber or contact export in code. The wallet CSV in code has Fan and Fan ID columns for your own sales. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Fan contact details | OnlyFansNot shown to creators; OnlyFans holds identity, payment and contact. Platform practice | FanslyNot shown; Fansly holds identity, billing and contact. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Message records | OnlyFansViewable; no export in code. Platform practice | FanslyNo message export documented in the Fansly research. Not established | VerdictNot established |
| Recurring subscriptions | OnlyFansAll subscriptions will be deleted and cannot be renewedwhen the account is deleted. Rule | FanslyNot portable. You can tell fans about your other channels before you leave. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Switching | OnlyFansNo migration tool. One reinstated creator reports losing every subscriber. Documented cases | FanslyNo migration tool. Fans found through Fansly’s discovery can’t be taken along. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geoblocking | OnlyFansCountry, US/Canadian/Australian state or province, and IP address. No city option. Platform practice | Fanslyblock entire countries, states, cities, or regions. Platform practice | VerdictFansly better |
| Watermarking and DRM | OnlyFansFree watermarking; opt-in video DRM. Platform practice | FanslyWatermarking; DRM not named in the Fansly research. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| DMCA | OnlyFansFree in-house takedown team; 1,018 notices in August 2026 (company figure). No obligation to act. Platform practice | FanslyDMCA Takedown Assistance; mechanics and coverage not described. Platform practice | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Privacy controls | OnlyFansBlock and restrict; two-step login and passkeys; suggestions opt-out. Platform practice | FanslyPermissions; blocking extends to linked accounts; delegated sessions that exclude payouts. Platform practice | VerdictRoughly equivalent |
| Data exports | OnlyFansPer-payout invoices and tax documents; no ledger or statistics export in code. Platform practice | FanslyCSV of wallet history, payout requests and earnings statistics in code; not confirmed live for every account. Platform practice | VerdictFansly better |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voluntary deletion | OnlyFansAccount stays open until subscriptions run off, then We will then pay all unpaid Creator Earnings and delete the account.One company-confirmed deletion payout took about 26 months. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyNo defined process; the app warns pending payouts may be interruptedon deletion. Platform practice | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Sold content | OnlyFansFans lose access to purchased content when you delete, so you keep control of it on exit. Rule | FanslyMedia purchased this way will always remain available to the fan, even if you later delete the media or your account. Platform practice | VerdictOnlyFans better |
| Access after termination | OnlyFansYou will not be able to access your Content after your account is terminated. Rule | FanslyNo post-termination access or export documented. Not established | VerdictNot established |
| Dimension | OnlyFans | Fansly | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off-platform conduct | OnlyFansNo reputation or morality clause in the live Terms. One ban after off-platform promotion cited a published content rule. RuleDocumented cases | FanslyA duty to act in the best interests of the Company at all times, whether on Fansly, on third-party websites, or offline, plus an anti-disparagement item. No enforcement of either found. RuleNot established | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| History of the creator clauses | OnlyFansProcess added in 2021 and 2024 (reasons, appeals). In 2024 the rewrite also dropped earlier discretionary wording about paying earnings unrelated to a breach and a best-efforts promise to return forfeited payments to fans. Rule | FanslyForfeiture, without paymentand related clauses date from October 2021; for any reason, with or without prior noticeadded May 2025. No retrieved version has ever promised notice, warnings, an appeal or a payout on termination. Rule | VerdictDifferent trade-off |
| Transparency | OnlyFansMonthly enforcement reports since 2021; two EU transparency reports; signed complaint replies. Platform practice | FanslyNo statistics published; most BBB complaints unanswered. Platform practice | VerdictOnlyFans better |
Pending · not in force OnlyFans has published, at an unlinked page, a revised Terms text dated October 2026. As written it would remove seriously or repeatedly
from the no-notice clause, add grounds for reputational harm and for not promptly providing requested information, add new powers to hold or redirect earnings, and add currency-conversion fees to payouts that need conversion. Creators report an email giving 1 November 2026 as the start; OnlyFans’ own statement of the date was not seen. The text could change before it takes effect. None of it is reflected in any verdict on this page.
Verdicts: OnlyFans better Fansly better Roughly equivalent Different trade-off Not established. Each is judged by which position is more creator-protective on that row alone. Code-level findings come from each platform’s publicly served app code; behaviour inside a logged-in creator account was not observed.
Method
This page is based on separate, completed investigations of OnlyFans and Fansly, including platform terms and policies, operational documentation, interface evidence, historical changes, creator case evidence and falsification passes, each followed by a verification and final-adjudication pass. Contractual powers were kept separate from actual practice. Case counts are cases identified, not incidence rates. Where evidence does not establish an answer, the comparison says so.
Help-centre and Terms wording was checked against the live pages on 5 October 2026. Statements by Fansly staff on public forums are informal, not published policy. Creator cases are not verified against either company’s records, and individual creators are not named. Nothing here is a finding of legal liability, and no score or overall winner is assigned.
Each platform has its own CHI assessment: OnlyFans and Fansly. How CHI works: Methodology.